You
would expect Joseph Goebbels and Winston Churchill to be totally opposite since
one man was for Nazi Germany and the other was opposing them. However, when it
comes to the idea of gaining and retaining power they aren’t that different at
all. Both of them knew with the war going that retaining power is crucial if
you want to win.
Even though the men took very different
approaches to retain power and gain support, their strategies had the same
effect. Churchill had built his listeners up with strategies on what he was
going to do and the circumstances of the war. He did this so the people he was
speaking to could trust him. Another thing he did was being honest, and during
a war of this nature, people value honesty because then they feel that this man
is truthful and could lead them to victory. Churchill reeled the people in to
get his support. Goebbels also reeled the people in; however, it was to make
them go along with his demands at the end of his speech. He jumps right in by
calling Bolshevism evil and how Jewry is the work of the devil. He follows with
explaining that they need to fight this evil and try and save Europe. He then
starts to quickly gain support and cheers from his “followers.”
They also know that this concept of
adding the “devil” into the speeches will make the crowd go wild. The “devil”
was always associated with evil, torture, and terror, even if you aren’t
religious. And this is why both men either implied about the devil or
explicitly say it. They did this because it’s a trigger. When a person hears
words like monster, devil, and torturer pertaining to the people that they’re
fighting, they’re going to want to fight them back to try and restore “goodness”
and “peace.” Both of the men used this strategy because they knew it would have
that effect on the people. However, Goebbels used this strategy a lot, which he
knew he had to because he knew the crazy things that Hitler and him were doing.
He made it seem like Jewry was a contagious, infectious, evil disease that’s
going to spread throughout the world. So he said to his people that we are
going to fight the evil and save the world, more specifically England. This
made the crowd go wild because who doesn’t want to be the superhero? While
Churchill was a little more subtle and clear, he made it clear that Germany was
the devil and they had to protect themselves. Even though Goebbels used a lot
of false statements and Churchill did not, they both had a tremendous effect on
the people. This is because they both knew they had to do anything to gain and
retain the power they had to try and win the war.
Hey there Kaela. I especially love your second paragraph. They defiantly did " work up" their listeners and using the devil as symbolism of the opposing country was the main way. I agree with you when you said "When a person hears words like monster, devil, and torturer pertaining to the people that they’re fighting, they’re going to want to fight them back to try and restore “goodness” and “peace.”, but then wouldn't some feel fearful? Maybe if you included how Churchill or Goebbels made themselves that superhero more , it would be clear. OTHERWISE, awesome job!
ReplyDeleteKaela: I agree with Gena's points--both the constructive criticism and the positive highlights. I particularly like how you focus on diction and analyze that--very useful tactic when doing close readings.
ReplyDelete